The report, called “Place Matters:
Challenges and Opportunities in Four Rural Americas,” identifies
four broad types of rural places:
• Amenity-rich areas that draw vacationers, retirees, and second
home-owners with their mountains, lakes, coastlines, or forests.
• Declining resource-dependent areas that once thrived on the agriculture,
timber, mining and manufacturing industries which, now threatened by globalization
and resource depletion, no longer support a vibrant middle class population.
• Chronically poor regions where residents and the land have suffered
decades of resource depletion and underinvestment.
• A transitional type characterized by amenity-driven growth and
resource-based decline. While traditional resource-based economies in
these areas have weakened, these transitional regions show potential for
amenity-driven growth.
In most respects, the Northern Neck of Virginia falls under
the last category - a region in transition. Where fishing and timbering
were once dominat industries, recent years have seen an influx of retirees,
and former urban dwellers seeking a simpler life. They are also drawn
by the natural beauty, the Chesapeake and its tributaries, and an ideal
rural existance.
Farming, meanwhile, has held its own as a Northern Neck
industry, and may have even grown in importance, as commodities prices
have rocketed higher in the last year.
“Our findings indicate that at the beginning of the twenty-first
century, ‘rural America’ is changing, often dramatically,
as economic, demographic and environmental forces sweep across the country,”
said Carsey Institute Director Mil Duncan, who authored the report with
Carsey senior fellow and UNH professor of sociology Larry Hamilton, writer
Leslie Hamilton, and Chris Colocousis, a Ph.D. candidate in sociology
at UNH.
The report surveyed residents from rural counties around the U.S.: Park
and Chafee counties in the amenity-rich Rocky Mountains of Colorado; Jewell,
Osborne, Republic and Smith counties in the declining heartland of Kansas;
Harlan and Lechter counties in Appalachian Kentucky; Coahoma, Tunica and
Quitman counties in the Mississippi Delta; Choctaw, Clarke, Marengo and
Wilcox counties in the “Black Belt” of Alabama; Clatsop County
in Oregon and Pacific County in Washington, both along the Pacific coast;
and Coos County, New Hampshire, and Oxford County, Maine, in the Northern
Forest.
While some issues – the need for more jobs chief among them –
transcended these four regions, others created unique problems or opportunities
to individual regions. Among the key issues:
• Only 40 percent of respondents to the survey, called the Community
and Environment in Rural America (CERA) survey, say they work full time,
well below the national average of 53 percent.
• Populations in all but the amenity-rich regions are aging, as
young adults leave, older residents remain, and reproduction rates fall.
Amenity-rich areas, on the other hand, are attracting both retiring boomers
and young professional families.
• The natural environment is a significant, although varied, force
on rural America, attracting residents to amenity-rich areas and leading
to their departure from declining areas where natural resources have been
depleted and economic shifts have diminished employment opportunities.
• Strong traditions of self-reliance and individualism remain in
all rural Americas; civic engagement is also strong, especially in the
declining Heartland. Political leanings and the role of religion in daily
life vary among the four areas.
• Concerns about community problems vary greatly among the four
rural Americas, with drugs and crime chief concerns in persistently poor
places, population decline worrisome in the declining-resource Heartland,
and growth and sprawl concerning residents of high-amenity areas.
“A one-size-fits-all approach to policymaking will not work, as
each of these regions struggles with its own place-specific issues and
problems,” notes Duncan. “Addressing the challenges in rural
America requires an understanding of the complex changes happening right
now in these very different regions in order to target their unique needs
and opportunities.”
|